One more thing i want to be more specific about. Words like journalist - scholar - investigator - researcher - learner - imply a process, a journey. Words like expert - master - imply a destination that has been reached. Imply a closed ending. So of course someone can be a reiki master or something, I'm not saying that's not allowed, but I would argue you can't be a UFO master, a ghost master... In my opinion. Partly because there's no accreditation system, and partly because we don't even understand what these things are, or if they're even real as we know them. (end update)
Forgot to introduce this as another segment of Fortean Tea! This is another 10 minute challenge, AKA stripdown challenge, AKA completely raw unedited video meaning I do pause, fumble, display general awkwardness. Today’s subject is inspired by a figure in the paranormal community (probably among many others) whose bio I stumbled upon, to find they have identified themselves as a “paranormal expert”. After spending the rest of the day wondering how one possibly reaches that qualification, pondering on such a strong and absolute word as “expert”, I almost synchronistically heard this quote as if it was directly addressing the question in my mind: “There are no [bigfoot] experts, only learners.” (Cliff from Finding Bigfoot). I believe that if I read dozens of books, heard dozens of stories, met dozens of people, traveled dozens of miles to visit locations in the field, I’d never be comfortable calling myself an expert. Learner, yes; philosopher, maybe; theorist, maybe; interpreter, -- ehh, maybe; explorer, yes; 2-cents-giver, sure. Expert? Never – because that would indicate we have reached the point where there are PROVEN FACTS. And right now, we don’t have that. Despite the clumsiness of this video, I THINK I made the points I wanted to make. The thing that gets me about investigators and voices in the paranormal community is they always state things as fact, as absolutes, as if they KNOW. And like... dude... you don't.
0 Comments